Pearl, a new AI-powered search engine, combines large language models with human expertise and a TrustScore™ system to provide safer, verified answers, aiming to tackle misinformation and legal challenges in AI search. (Source: Image by RR)

Early Reviews Highlight Both Potential and Flaws in Pearl’s AI-Human Collaboration

Pearl, a new AI-powered search engine developed by JustAnswer founder Andy Kurtzig, combines large language models with human fact-checking to provide answers, aiming to address the challenges of misinformation and legal liability faced by traditional AI search engines. Unlike its predecessor JustAnswer, Pearl offers a freemium model where users can access AI-generated answers for free, along with a TrustScore™ rating from 1 to 5 to indicate the quality of the response, and opt for expert human input via a $28-a-month subscription service.

Pearl, according to a story in wired.com, positions itself as a safer alternative to other AI search engines, claiming reduced misinformation risks and protections under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act by incorporating human experts in its answer process. However, early user experiences revealed inconsistencies, with AI and human responses often being similar and some experts charging additional fees for further information, which undermined the platform’s promise of superior, reliable service.

While Pearl’s human-AI collaboration shows promise for improving answer accuracy, its functionality and value have been met with mixed reactions. Users report that its AI-generated responses often align with basic internet content, and human expert input is sometimes delayed or lacks substantial improvement over AI answers. Additionally, the service’s reliance on subscription fees and occasional upcharges raises questions about its accessibility and cost-effectiveness.

Ultimately, Pearl may represent a step forward in integrating AI and human expertise in search engines, but its practical utility and user experience leave room for refinement. Many users might prefer existing free platforms like YouTube or Reddit for practical guidance, questioning whether Pearl’s model justifies its subscription-based approach.

read more at wired.com