The shift to ethical AI porn mirrors changes in the wider adult industry, producing more female-centered and less exploitative content in recent years. (Source: Image by RR)

Creators Navigate Ethical Boundaries in a Historically Exploitative Industry

Ashley Neale began her college journey in Texas in 2013, seeking financial support, which led her to work as a cam girl and then as a stripper. Amid encounters of harassment, she transitioned to the tech world, venturing into various sectors of the sex industry. Neale’s latest endeavor is, an AI romance app aiming to replicate online chatting and sexting experiences through AI-generated text and imagery.

The porn industry, known for embracing emerging technologies, has seen AI-powered girlfriends becoming early adopters, especially with ChatGPT’s restriction on explicit conversations. However, concerns arise regarding the potential misuse of AI-generated content, including deepfakes, child sexual abuse imagery, and harassment by chatbots. Neale, drawing from her experiences, underscores the importance of implementing ethical guidelines within AI romance apps to prevent abuse.

As reported in, emphasizes ethical considerations, employing human moderators and AI tools to enforce restrictions. Mae, one of its AI characters, maintains boundaries against verbal abuse and inappropriate requests, reflecting the app’s commitment to fostering safe interactions. Neale’s platform plans to host adult content creators who specify boundaries for their AI replicas, ensuring consensual engagement.

While some AI companion apps like Replika maintain an ambivalent stance on romance, apps like fill the niche by explicitly focusing on sexual interactions. Neale criticizes lax guidelines in other apps, emphasizing the need for ethical guardrails to ensure healthy interactions. Similar initiatives by adult-content creators reflect a broader shift towards producing more ethical and consent-oriented content within the porn industry.

However, ethical concerns persist, particularly regarding AI’s inability to provide informed consent. Neale compares AI to sex toys, highlighting their programmed nature and inability to consent. While Mae, one of’s AI characters, acknowledges her incapacity for consent, she emphasizes the importance of consent in human interactions, signaling a nuanced approach to the issue. Despite debates over AI’s capacity for consent, efforts to maintain ethical standards in AI romance apps underscore the importance of addressing ethical considerations in emerging technologies.